Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Deleu wrote on 8/24/21 13:53:
> The proposal is rooted in making it easier for release managers and rfc=
> authors to refine code changes that may or may not be necessary to
> accomplish a previously approved RFC.
I don't understand how this proposal helps with this. If changes are
necessary to accomplish a previously approved RFC, that means the RFC
isn't fully implemented, so there are bugs, and bugs should be addressed
using the normal bugfix process. They shouldn't require another RFC.
If a change requires another RFC, that means something is being proposed
that changes the behavior of a previous RFC (or adds to it). This is a