> "Terrible" is the amount of humans having their lives taken by a pandemic.
> This is at most slightly inconvenient for you. The aggressive tone in this
> discussion is extremely unnecessary.
When the voted syntax is technically infeasible due to parser issues
which can only be resolved by another RFC, albeit a sensible one,
I would say this is indeed a terrible choice.
I personally prefer <<...>> but I can accept Rust's syntax more easily
than @@ which seems to come from a preconception that it will
transition to @ many moons in the future which is completely bonkers.
George P. Banyard