Re: [RFC] Strict operators directive

This is only part of a thread. view whole thread
May 16, 2020 14:20 (Mark Randall)
On 15/05/2020 23:03, Arnold Daniels wrote:
> Hi all, > > I'd like to restart the discussion for the strict_opterators RFC ( >
I think this kind of change will have a long term positive impact, but it will require a lot of work to update code. IMHO we need to know what is happening with editions, as I think this would be an ideal candidate for that rather than another declare It would would give people years warning that they've got that long to add their correct castings etc before the old behaviour is removed.