Re: [PHP-DEV] Capturing reasons for votes for historical sake?

This is only part of a thread. view whole thread
March 18, 2020 21:52 ("Christoph M. Becker")
On 17.03.2020 at 20:33, Mike Schinkel wrote:

>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 4:44 AM, Christoph M. Becker <> wrote: >> >> On 17.03.2020 at 09:26, Nikita Popov wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:09 PM Jakob Givoni <> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 1:29 PM Mike Schinkel <> wrote: >>>>> If we had that we could list the reasons and the number of votes that >>>> choose those reasons on the RFC for historical purposes. >>>> >>>> Thanks Mike, exactly what I was thinking when I started writing RFC: >>>> COPA (! >>>> >>>> As you can see in my "Voting" section, I had the idea to capture >>>> reasons for no-votes, to document it in the outcome of the RFC, should >>>> it fail. >>>> It would have saved my research quite a bit if I had had the no-vote >>>> reasons for the RFCs I reference at the bottom. >>>> >>>> +1 on the idea from me! >>>> >>> >>> FWIW this has been discussed a few times already, and I believe the >>> consensus is: We're happy to have *optional* reasons for votes, if someone >>> actually implements it. >>> >>> For the number of times someone has brought this up on list, there has been >>> a distinct lack of volunteers for actually making it happen ;) >> >> If anybody wants to take a stab at this, patching the doodle plugin[1] >> would be the way to go. >> >> [1] >> <> > > Ah, I see. So set up locally and I'd have what I need?
It might work to install a plain DokuWiki, and to put the repo contents on top. Otherwise, see <>. -- Christoph M. Becker