> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 2:38 PM Sara Golemon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Thanks for picking it up, and I agree with your response to Larry. As
>> as it would be to lazy iterate, the scanner is just in NO shape to
>> reentering userspace and potentially reinvoking the scanner before the
>> first run through is done.
> If this is the current state, maybe it would suffice to declare the return
> type as `iterable`, and return a strict (fully populated) structure in a
> first implementation, later to be changed to an iterator, if applicable?
> I think that's an optimistic, but ultimately harmless approach. Arrays
satisfy Iterables. Worst case we never improve on that. Best case we get