Re: [RFC] ::func resolution for functions

This is only part of a thread. view whole thread
  108461
February 11, 2020 11:26 manuelcanga@gmail.com (Manuel Canga)
I'm sorry. I forgot subject due to nerves. I add it.

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 12:13, Manuel Canga <manuelcanga@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi internals, > I Would like to present a possible new "::func resolution" for your consideration. > > In first place, PHP now support "::class" in this way: > > use My\I18N; > > $mapped_array = array_map([I18N::class, 'translate'], $array); > It avoid add Full I18N namespace in callback. > > However with functions is different: > > use function \My\I18N\i18n_translate; > > $mapped_array = array_map('\My\I18N\i18n_translate', $array); > > What is the useful here of importing the function?. > My proposal is ":func" in order to avoid full namespace in callback of functions. E.g: > > use function \My\I18N\i18n_translate; > > $mapped_array = array_map(i18n_translate::func, $array); > > "::func" should validate if a function with `` is imported. In this case, "::func" is replaced with FQN of this function, otherwise with only "" > > What is your opinion ? Do you see it useful ? > > Thanks and I'm sorry for my English( I'm a Spanish ). > > Regards > >