Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)

  107448
October 8, 2019 23:58 mo.mu.wss@gmail.com ("M. W. Moe")
Hello,

the point Stanislav is really not about whom; that's about thinking, work,
effort, personal walk thru a problem;
and I am sorry he is fully right; live example:

"I think that's been inconsistencies from the part of early contributors
which is the same reason we are having "haystack and needle" problem and
I'm not sure there's a problem fixing those old days mistake."

is this embodiment of arrogance, vulgarity hence stupidity because to me
they are synonyms helps anyone?

Regards.

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:39 PM Mark Randall <marandall@php.net> wrote:

> On 09/10/2019 00:26, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > That's part of the problem. RFC should be for something that is > > necessary and beneficial for the whole community, doubly and triply so > > when we're talking about BC breaks. It shouldn't be just "whatever I > > want, let me put it to a vote". RFCs are not a twitter poll where > > anybody can vote on anything and anything goes. It should be used > > responsibly, and if people don't understand this responsibility maybe > > it's too early for them to propose any RFCs. > > Might I request that you please stick to discussing the actual topic of > the RFC, rather than trying to shift the conversation towards who can > and cannot propose RFCs :-) > > If you want to discuss changing the RFC mechanics and who is entitled to > make them, please make your own RFC. > > Thank you. > > Mark Randall > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
  107449
October 9, 2019 07:43 oludonsexy@gmail.com (Olumide Samson)
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 12:59 AM M. W. Moe wss@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello, > > the point Stanislav is really not about whom; that's about thinking, work, > effort, personal walk thru a problem; > and I am sorry he is fully right; live example: > > "I think that's been inconsistencies from the part of early contributors > which is the same reason we are having "haystack and needle" problem and > I'm not sure there's a problem fixing those old days mistake." > > is this embodiment of arrogance, vulgarity hence stupidity because to me > they are synonyms helps anyone? > > Regards. > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:39 PM Mark Randall <marandall@php.net> wrote: > > > On 09/10/2019 00:26, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > > That's part of the problem. RFC should be for something that is > > > necessary and beneficial for the whole community, doubly and triply so > > > when we're talking about BC breaks. It shouldn't be just "whatever I > > > want, let me put it to a vote". RFCs are not a twitter poll where > > > anybody can vote on anything and anything goes. It should be used > > > responsibly, and if people don't understand this responsibility maybe > > > it's too early for them to propose any RFCs. > > > > Might I request that you please stick to discussing the actual topic of > > the RFC, rather than trying to shift the conversation towards who can > > and cannot propose RFCs :-) > > > > If you want to discuss changing the RFC mechanics and who is entitled to > > make them, please make your own RFC. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Mark Randall > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > I think you've been using too much of "vulg**, stup**, etc" that makes
absolute nonsense since yesterday. Can you just tone down or watch what you write if you're vexing out about someone else's opinion? Even I can do same back to you, but won't stoop so low to that level. I think this list should be for mature minds that can agree or disagree peacefully without stupidity in becoming.
>