On Mon, Apr 15, 2019, at 6:48 AM, Benjamin Morel wrote:
> Even though I was originally hoping for something closer to JS syntax,
> considering Nikita's summary it looks like the best contender is still
> fn(), as originally proposed.
> At least it looks like a function indeed, to the uninitiated.
> So FWIW, I think that a vote for the fn() syntax only still makes sense.
> The risk with the 2 or 3 options is never being able to reach a concensus:
> is a relative majority or an absolute majority for one of the syntaxes
> acceptable, or are you required by the RFC process to get a 2/3 majority
> for this vote as well? If so, considering the discussion so far, I think
> this will be hard to achieve with 2 choices, let alone with 3.
> - Ben
I don't think the wiki currently supports it, but that's exactly what ranked choice voting is for. :-)