> Even though I was originally hoping for something closer to JS syntax,
> considering Nikita's summary it looks like the best contender is still
> fn(), as originally proposed.
> At least it looks like a function indeed, to the uninitiated.
> So FWIW, I think that a vote for the fn()Â syntax only still makes
> sense. The risk with the 2 or 3 options is never being able to reach a
> concensus: is a relative majority or an absolute majority for one of
> the syntaxes acceptable, or are you required by the RFC process to get
> a 2/3 majority for this vote as well? If so, considering the
> discussion so far, I think this will be hard to achieve with 2
> choices, let alone with 3.
> - Ben
If it lands in a secondary three way vote I would assume
it's the vote getting the most votes. Otherwise the RFC
could land in a limbo, getting yes on feature but no on
syntax. Good to get assumption confirmed though...