Re: [PHP-DEV] A validator module for PHP7

This is only part of a thread. view whole thread
  100527
September 11, 2017 21:49 yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:

> Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, lists@rhsoft.net <lists@rhsoft.net> > wrote: > >> >> Am 11.09.2017 um 23:07 schrieb Yasuo Ohgaki >> >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Reay <php-lists@koalephant.com >>> > >>> >>>> So, you still didn’t actually provide an example. I *guess* you’re >>>> talking >>>> about character class validation or something else equally “simple”, >>>> because I can’t imagine what else would be a common enough case that >>>> you’d >>>> want to have built-in rules for, and that you wouldn’t internally use >>>> RegExp to test anyway. >>>> >>> >>> Your request is like "Devil's Proof". Example code that cannot do things >>> with existing API cannot exist with meaningful manner. It can be >>> explained >>> why it cannot, though. Try what "validate" string validator can do, >>> Then you'll see. >>> >>> There is no STRING validation filter currently. This fact alone, >>> it could be said "filter cannot do string validation currently". >>> >>> List of problems in current validation filter >>> >> but you still fail to explain why in the world you don#t try to enhance >> the existing filter functions instead invent a new beast leading finally to >> have the existin filter functions and your new stuff which share the same >> intention >> >> > Why don't you read previous RFC and the vote result? > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter >
I'm a bit surprised by the fact there are "filter improvement" supporters. You should have participated in the previous RFC discussion. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net
  100529
September 11, 2017 21:56 lists@rhsoft.net ("lists@rhsoft.net")
Am 11.09.2017 um 23:49 schrieb Yasuo Ohgaki:
> but you still fail to explain why in the world you don#t try to > enhance the existing filter functions instead invent a new beast > leading finally to have the existin filter functions and your > new stuff which share the same intention > > > Why don't you read previous RFC and the vote result? > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter > <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter> > > > I'm a bit surprised by the fact there are "filter improvement" supporters. > You should have participated in the previous RFC discussion
and i am suprise that you act *that* stubborn and obviously think when you give the bike a new name someone will buy it instead really consider the contras of previous proposals