Re: [PHP-DEV] GD vs Imagick

This is only part of a thread. view whole thread
  100227
August 16, 2017 14:13 Remi Collet <remi@fedoraproject.org>
--K3kwcNTuwpxjxjUe0E2kHwkxRWvLoC2gt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le 15/08/2017 =C3=A0 12:52, Rasmus Schultz a =C3=A9crit :
> I am starting to wonder why GD is the default in PHP?
Don't really know, perhaps because the first one ? But we have various alternatives: - imagick - gmagick - vips (perhaps others) And ImageMagick is really an ugly upstream - most common commit message is "..." [1] - unstable API (imagick extension even check that build version =3D=3D=3D runtime versio= ns) - soname bump in patch version (yes, really, when 4th digit change) - lack of CI (else I don't understand how they can release with broken tests [2]) And about extensions: - imagick conflicts with gmagick (as GraphicMagick is a fork of ImageMagick, you cannot load both in the same process), so having imagick the default one will kill gmagick. [1] https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commits/master [2] https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues?utf8=3D%E2%9C%93&q=3Dis= %3Aissue%20is%3Aclosed%20author%3Aremicollet%20 --K3kwcNTuwpxjxjUe0E2kHwkxRWvLoC2gt--